Effective learning happens, I believe, when students are pushed to encounter complex problems and realistic situations to which there are no simple solutions, correct answers, or easy outcomes. To achieve this requires creating rhetorical situations that strive not for realism, but engagement; the ultimate goal, then, is to push students to treat each project as a genuine communicative instance and opportunity for growth and reflection, even if the result is failure or frustration. I see my role as complicating how students approach such challenges and guiding them to work through and with complexity, rather than against it. Whether teaching English majors in the Writing Concentration or students from across all four colleges at Xavier, my pedagogy is grounded in a desire to engage students in practical, scaffolded assignments that build upon their individual skills or interests while layering opportunities for critical writing, hands-on learning, and local exigencies.

Course Sections Taught at Xavier University (fall 2018 - fall 2022)

Professional and Technical Writing

ENGL 305: Professional Writing (Fall 2018, Fall 2020, Spring 2022)

TBA


ENGL 312: Technical Writing (Spring 2019, Fall 2022)

TBA


Multimedia Writing

ENGL 499: Senior Seminar - Visual Rhetoric and Storytelling (Spring 2021)

TBA

ENGL 339: Digital Writing - Sonic Rhetoric, Soundwriting, and Podcasting (Fall 2021)

TBA


First Year Composition

ENGL 115: Honors Rhetoric - (Spring 2021)

TBA


Visualizations of Honors Rhetoric Teaching Evaluation Responses

Course Evaluation Responses: I devoted significant effort to this course.

Based on course evaluation mean (5 = strongly agree, 4= agree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 2 = disagree, 1 = strongly disagree)

Course Evaluation Responses: The instructor engaged me in intellectual challenges.

Based on course evaluation mean (5 = strongly agree, 4= agree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 2 = disagree, 1 = strongly disagree)

Course Evaluation Responses: My knowledge of the subject matter increased in this class.

Based on course evaluation mean (5 = strongly agree, 4= agree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 2 = disagree, 1 = strongly disagree)

Course Evaluation Responses: The instructor made the importance of the subject matter clear.

Based on course evaluation mean (5 = strongly agree, 4= agree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 2 = disagree, 1 = strongly disagree)

Course Evaluation Responses: The instructor fostered a supportive learning environment.

Based on course evaluation mean (5 = strongly agree, 4= agree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree, 2 = disagree, 1 = strongly disagree)

Course Evaluation Responses: The instructor fostered mutual respect among students.

Course Evaluation Summary: The course included a variety of techniques to help me learn.

Course Evaluation Summary: I received constructive feedback… to help me learn.

Course Evaluation Summary: The course contributed to my ability to reflect on ethically, morally or socially significant issues

Mean of Honors Rhetoric Course Evaluation, Spring 2021 to Fall 2023

Visualizations of Upper Level Course Evaluations

Mean of Upper-Level Course Evaluations Compared to CAS, Spring 21 to Fall 23